this is a message i received from mr. Hasanuddin. it's interesting, so i thought i will share with you.
Dear Pulasthi,
I liked your "cool" blog. Although your expertise appears to be technical, I would like to tell you of a breaking new item in a different realm of science. The implications of this new model could have profound reaching effects that impact all of technology, and humanity as well.
I am the author of a new cosmological model. The fact that it deductively shows purpose and connectedness between previously considered anomalous phenomena (solar wind, galaxy formation, supermassive galactic central black-holes, nebulae, and how the next Big Bang will occur) it not really of direct concern to either you or technology. There is one very ominous implication that is of concern: the prediction that mini black-holes are stable. This is troubling, because one of the predicted possible achievements of the newly completed world's-largest-machine, LHC, is to produce man's first (and last) synthetic black-hole material. If the model is correct, and LHC achieves this goal, then an unstoppable horrific chain of events could follow. This is actually a technology issue as much as it is a theoretic, particle physics, and moral issue.
Once the danger was made evident, I changed gears with regards to my work. Instead of targeting its release in a peer-review journal, I wrote it with the "lay" science-oriented reader in mind…people like yourself. Why? LHC is scheduled to be turned on for its maiden run this June. There simply is no time to wait for the peer review process. If this model is correct, then LHC must be postponed. The only foreseeable way to do that is through public pressure. Hence the "book." You can download a free copy at http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/u56srb or you can buy the published version, The Dominium, at most online bookstores.
Highlighting the concern is the fact that the new model has been debated on my Scientific American blogspace for five months http://science-community.sciam.com/forum.jspa?forumID=300005039 This adds to the level of concern because none of its critics have been able to identify a single flaw with either its logic or science foundations. Three would-be detractors actually ended up supplying three new lines favoring the new models validity.
Please, consider reading the new model (which really "begins" on page 12 of the download) and then writing about it. Public awareness is the only way to prove the validity of any theory. It is also the only way to hope to change the course that we are on.
Sincerely,
Hasanuddin